![]() QUOTE (elodea Nov 8 2012, 03:33 PM) Seriously, this horse has been dead a long time. Plenty of great games get poor scores from idiots because they feel it isn't enough like Call of Duty (no, really, I'm not making a pedantic CoD-kiddies joke, turn on AdBlocker and look at these two) or because being contrarian gets you hits/makes you cool, it's just a matter of making sure there are enough other reviews to even things out.) (Though I'd understand if you're worried about UWE losing some of its (IMO) deserved sales because idiots go "Oh, low Metacritic score, must be bad! Let's not buy this.", there's just no need to get worked up about it. Games journalism is a joke for the most part, just have a laugh about it and move on with your life. NS2's "graphics" (and I'm not talking about aesthetics or any other term that sometimes confuses such reviewers) are absolutely extraordinary, very few games have textures and models as detailed as this one, and even fewer have such great lighting - animation quality isn't perfect, but when I see games like Assassins Creed being praised for it (and my god is the AC series' character animation awful), I'd say NS2 is definitely "AAA" quality, relatively.īut for the rest of this thread, don't get too pissy about this. ![]() However, I would agree this is extremely odd, if true. (Reviews are subjective and relative, it makes absolutely no sense to assign an objective and abstract number to that.) I didn't read the review because Gamespot is just terrible in general, and I don't particularly care for scores either, because scores are an absolutely awful way of judging a game. ![]() QUOTE (tarquinbb Nov 8 2012, 08:48 PM) seriously.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |